![]() Needs the wide apertures the ´lux is your lens, if not the ´cron is (more uniform image in the entire field), wile the ´lux has a higherĬontrast in the center of the image wide open, so if your photography Yes Jonas, the need of a faster speed is the reason, they also have aĭiferent image signature, ´cron is better at corners of the frame I have noticed that a lot of pros use the summilux, is this only a need for speed or does it offer other advantages? Not a great difference but the summicron seems to be better (not that I´m going to shoot MTF graphs). Photodo gives the two lenses the following grades summicron: 4.1 summilux: 3.8. I have seached the archives but coulden´t really find anything. What are the caracteristics of these two lenses, how do they differ (besides the adifference in speed). I just don´t know if I should buy the 35 mm f/2 summicron or the 35 mm f/1.4 summilux. I´m going to by my first M6 soon, and have decided that my first lens should be a 35 mm Asph. 35 mm Summicron vs Summilux 35 mm Summicron vs Summilux : LUSENET : Leica Photography : One Thread ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |